Pages

Jul 31, 2013

The second generation ASUS Nexus 7 came over, here goes the unboxing

It’s been a few days since the second generation ASUS Nexus 7 hit the shelves, so we promptly got our hands on the hot hardware. The successor of the most popular slate in the Android realm is currently available in the United States with an entry-level price tag of $229.

The new Nexus 7 is everything a tablet sequel should be. It is more powerful, thinner, lighter, and better put together. It also comes with a brand new Android version to boot .


ASUS Nexus 7 (2013) live photos

The newly released ASUS Nexus 7 is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro SoC with four 1.5GHz Krait CPU cores, and Adreno 320 GPU. There’s 2GB of RAM on board and 16 or 32GB of non-expandable memory available.

The display of the newcomer is a gorgeous 7″ LED backlit IPS LCD unit with a resolution of 1920 X 1200 pixels. A 5MP camera on the back, 1.2MP front-facing unit, stereo speakers, and full connectivity suite including optional LTE complete the highlights of the slate’s specifications. The 2013 Nexus 7 is powered by a 3950mAh battery.

The OS on board of the Nexus 7 is Android 4.3 Jelly Bean. You can see it in action, along with an unboxing of the tablet in the video below.


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

Sony Xperia ZR battery life test breakdown

The Sony Xperia ZR is the little brother of the Xperia Z and Xperia ZL, and boasts pretty much every key specification they have. The major is the 4.55″ 720p display, which should be kinder to the equally large 2300 mAh battery inside the phone.

Identical chipsets and batteries plus a smaller screen of lower resolution give the Xperia ZR every chance of beating its premium rivals.

Let’s kick the battery test off with 3G talk time. The Sony Xperia ZR did 17 hours and 48 minutes of 3G calls before its 2300mAh battery went flat. That’s nearly 5 hours more than Sony officially says the phone is capable of, which is quite impressive on its own, but even more so considering that its better than the Xperia Z achievement by a bit over an hour and a half.


Talk time

  • Huawei Ascend Mate
    25:12
  • Motorola RAZR MAXX (ICS)
    21:18
  • LG Optimus G Pro
    20:45
  • Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
    20:24
  • Motorola RAZR i
    20:07
  • BlackBerry Q10
    20:00
  • Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3
    19:54
  • Sony Xperia SP
    19:49
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
    18:03
  • Sony Xperia ZR
    17:48
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II N7100
    16:57
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
    16:40
  • Sony Xperia Z
    16:03
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom
    15:32
  • LG Optimus G
    15:30
  • Sony Xperia ZL
    15:22
  • Nokia Lumia 720
    15:17
  • BlackBerry Q5
    14:31
  • Nokia Lumia 620
    14:17
  • Oppo Find 5
    14:17
  • Google Nexus 4
    14:17
  • HTC One
    13:38
  • HTC One X+
    13:31
  • Nokia Lumia 520
    13:33
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
    13:10
  • Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos
    12:45
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 GPE
    12:37
  • Huawei Ascend P1
    12:30
  • Sony Xperia L
    12:30
  • HTC Butterfly
    12:18
  • Samsung Galaxy Note
    12:14
  • Samsung I8530 Galaxy Beam
    11:58
  • Samsung Galaxy Premier
    11:30
  • Asus Padfone 2
    11:20
  • HTC Droid DNA
    11:07
  • HTC Windows Phone 8X
    11:07
  • Samsung Wave 3 S8600
    11:07
  • Samsung I9105 Galaxy S II Plus
    11:06
  • HTC Desire X
    11:03
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
    11:01
  • HTC One X (AT&T, LTE)
    10:35
  • Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III
    10:20
  • Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III (JB)
    10:15
  • Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2
    10:03
  • HTC One V
    10:00
  • Meizu MX 4-core
    10:00
  • Samsung Galaxy Express
    10:00
  • HTC One X
    9:57
  • HTC One S
    9:42
  • Samsung I9103 Galaxy R
    9:40
  • HTC Sensation XL
    9:30
  • Nokia Lumia 810
    9:05
  • Nokia Lumia 710
    9:05
  • Acer CloudMobile S500
    9:05
  • Motorola Atrix HD
    9:04
  • HTC Vivid
    9:02
  • Nokia Lumia 920
    8:56
  • Nokia Lumia 610
    8:51
  • HTC Rhyme
    8:48
  • Apple iPhone 5
    8:42
  • LG Optimus 3D Max P720
    8:42
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
    8:41
  • Meizu MX
    8:39
  • Samsung Galaxy S II
    8:35
  • Samsung Galaxy S Duos
    8:28
  • Nokia Lumia 800
    8:25
  • Samsung Galaxy Nexus
    8:23
  • Nokia Lumia 510
    8:22
  • Samsung Galaxy Fame
    8:21
  • BlackBerry Z10
    8:20
  • HTC Desire V
    8:20
  • Samsung Captivate Glide
    8:20
  • Sony Xperia T
    8:15
  • HTC Rezound (LTE)
    8:10
  • Samsung Galaxy Note (LTE)
    8:02
  • LG Optimus Vu
    7:57
  • LG Optimus 4X HD
    7:41
  • Apple iPhone 4S
    7:41
  • Samsung i937 Focus S
    7:25
  • HTC Evo 4G LTE (LTE)
    7:21
  • Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G
    7:14
  • Nokia Lumia 820
    7:09
  • Sony Xperia acro S
    7:09
  • Samsung Rugby Smart I847
    7:09
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro
    6:57
  • Nokia N9
    6:57
  • HTC Radar
    6:53
  • Samsung Galaxy Ace Duos
    6:53
  • BlackBerry Curve 9380
    6:52
  • Sony Xperia E dual
    6:42
  • Samsung Galaxy S III mini
    6:22
  • Samsung Galaxy Pocket
    5:54
  • Nokia Lumia 900 for AT&T (LTE)
    5:53
  • Sony Xperia ion LTE
    5:52
  • Sony Xperia P
    5:33
  • Nokia 808 PureView
    5:16
  • LG Nitro HD (LTE)
    5:16
  • HTC Titan II (LTE)
    5:10
  • BlackBerry Bold 9790
    5:00
  • Pantech Burst
    4:46

The good news continue with the web browsing test. Here, the Sony Xperia ZR tops everything we’ve ever tested by scoring 11 hours and 20 minutes. The combination of Chrome as a default browser and the smaller screen are probably to thank for this great result.

Web browsing

  • Sony Xperia ZR
    11:20
  • BlackBerry Q5
    10:04
  • HTC One
    9:58
  • Apple iPhone 5
    9:56
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
    9:47
  • Motorola RAZR MAXX (ICS)
    9:12
  • Apple iPad mini
    9:05
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom
    8:51
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II N7100
    8:48
  • BlackBerry Q10
    8:42
  • Nokia Lumia 810
    8:20
  • Asus Padfone 2
    8:20
  • Huawei Ascend Mate
    8:17
  • Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3
    8:17
  • Nokia Lumia 610
    8:01
  • HTC One X+
    7:56
  • Sony Xperia E dual
    7:42
  • Samsung Galaxy S III mini
    7:38
  • Nokia Lumia 720
    7:37
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
    7:35
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
    7:24
  • Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
    7:23
  • HTC Radar
    7:17
  • Nokia Lumia 520
    7:15
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 GPE
    7:13
  • Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos
    7:09
  • Samsung Galaxy Express
    7:09
  • Motorola RAZR i
    7:06
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
    6:58
  • Apple iPhone 4S
    6:56
  • HTC One V
    6:49
  • LG Optimus G Pro
    6:40
  • Samsung I9105 Galaxy S II Plus
    6:40
  • Sony Xperia L
    6:40
  • HTC Droid DNA
    6:40
  • Samsung Galaxy Premier
    6:40
  • Motorola Atrix HD
    6:40
  • BlackBerry Curve 9380
    6:40
  • Sony Xperia Z
    6:37
  • Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2
    6:35
  • BlackBerry Z10
    6:27
  • Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III (JB)
    6:27
  • HTC Butterfly
    6:24
  • Sony Xperia SP
    6:18
  • Samsung i937 Focus S
    6:15
  • Nokia Lumia 510
    6:13
  • Sony Xperia ZL
    6:04
  • HTC Windows Phone 8X
    6:01
  • Sony Xperia ion LTE
    5:56
  • Samsung Galaxy Fame
    5:55
  • Samsung Rugby Smart I847
    5:53
  • Pantech Burst
    5:51
  • Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G
    5:45
  • HTC Desire V
    5:44
  • HTC Evo 4G LTE
    5:41
  • Nokia Lumia 920
    5:40
  • Samsung Wave 3 S8600
    5:34
  • Oppo Find 5
    5:33
  • Sony Xperia T
    5:33
  • Samsung Captivate Glide
    5:33
  • Samsung I8530 Galaxy Beam
    5:28
  • Samsung Galaxy Note LTE
    5:24
  • Samsung Galaxy S Duos
    5:23
  • HTC Sensation XL
    5:20
  • Meizu MX 4-core
    5:19
  • Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III
    5:17
  • Sony Xperia acro S
    5:16
  • HTC Rezound
    5:16
  • HTC Desire X
    5:16
  • LG Optimus G
    5:15
  • HTC Rhyme
    5:08
  • Samsung I9103 Galaxy R
    5:07
  • HTC One X (AT&T)
    5:03
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro
    4:50
  • LG Optimus Vu
    4:49
  • HTC Vivid
    4:46
  • Samsung Galaxy Ace Duos
    4:45
  • Meizu MX
    4:35
  • Google Nexus 4
    4:34
  • Nokia N9
    4:33
  • Acer CloudMobile S500
    4:32
  • Nokia Lumia 820
    4:24
  • Samsung Galaxy S II
    4:24
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
    4:20
  • HTC One X
    4:18
  • Nokia 808 PureView
    4:14
  • LG Optimus 3D Max P720
    4:10
  • Nokia Lumia 900 for AT&T
    4:10
  • Nokia Lumia 800
    4:07
  • HTC Titan II (LTE)
    4:05
  • HTC One S
    4:03
  • BlackBerry Bold 9790
    4:02
  • LG Nitro HD
    4:00
  • LG Optimus 4X HD
    3:59
  • Sony Xperia P
    3:59
  • Nokia Lumia 710
    3:51
  • Nokia Lumia 620
    3:50
  • Samsung Galaxy Pocket
    3:47
  • Samsung Galaxy Note
    3:35
  • Huawei Ascend P1
    3:23
  • Samsung Galaxy Nexus
    3:01

We now arrive at the final test – video playback. Here, the Xperia ZR did alright, but nothing breathtaking. Thanks to its 720p screen it beat the 1080p display rocking Xperia Z (5:39) and Xperia ZL (5:28) by scoring two hours more – 7 hours and 30 minutes. That’s not a particularly impressive score, but it’s not half bad either.

We ran the test with Mobile BRAVIA 2 turned on as we believed that’s how most users will be using their smartphones. Nevertheless, even with it switched off, the battery life wasn’t affected in a noticable way.

Video playback

  • Motorola RAZR MAXX (ICS)
    16:35
  • Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
    14:17
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
    13:12
  • Apple iPad mini
    12:51
  • Samsung Galaxy Premier
    12:51
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 GPE
    12:32
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
    12:30
  • BlackBerry Q5
    12:28
  • Huawei Ascend Mate
    12:18
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
    11:29
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II N7100
    11:27
  • BlackBerry Q10
    11:15
  • Apple iPhone 5
    10:12
  • HTC One
    10:02
  • Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III
    10:01
  • Samsung Galaxy Express
    10:00
  • Samsung I9105 Galaxy S II Plus
    10:00
  • Nokia 808 PureView
    9:53
  • Samsung I8530 Galaxy Beam
    9:42
  • Samsung Rugby Smart I847
    9:34
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom
    9:30
  • HTC One S
    9:28
  • Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III (JB)
    9:27
  • Apple iPhone 4S
    9:24
  • HTC Evo 4G LTE
    9:07
  • BlackBerry Z10
    8:44
  • LG Optimus G Pro
    8:40
  • Nokia N9
    8:40
  • Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3
    8:34
  • HTC Butterfly
    8:28
  • Samsung Galaxy Note
    8:25
  • Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos
    8:11
  • HTC One X+
    8:11
  • Motorola RAZR i
    8:11
  • Samsung Galaxy S II
    8:00
  • Samsung i937 Focus S
    7:55
  • Samsung Wave 3 S8600
    7:52
  • Samsung Galaxy S III mini
    7:46
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
    7:45
  • Asus Padfone 2
    7:38
  • Huawei Ascend P1
    7:38
  • Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G
    7:33
  • Sony Xperia ZR
    7:30
  • HTC Droid DNA
    7:30
  • Samsung Galaxy Note LTE
    7:30
  • Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2
    7:30
  • Sony Xperia SP
    7:27
  • Nokia Lumia 610
    7:23
  • LG Optimus G
    7:16
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
    7:03
  • Nokia Lumia 720
    6:43
  • Meizu MX 4-core
    6:33
  • Nokia Lumia 620
    6:32
  • HTC Windows Phone 8X
    6:27
  • Sony Xperia E dual
    6:27
  • Nokia Lumia 810
    6:27
  • HTC Desire V
    6:26
  • HTC One X (AT&T)
    6:26
  • Nokia Lumia 820
    6:25
  • Samsung Galaxy Ace Duos
    6:25
  • Nokia Lumia 510
    6:23
  • LG Optimus Vu
    6:23
  • Samsung I9103 Galaxy R
    6:21
  • Nokia Lumia 920
    6:19
  • HTC Sensation XL
    6:12
  • Samsung Galaxy Pocket
    6:06
  • Samsung Captivate Glide
    6:04
  • Sony Xperia ion LTE
    6:03
  • Samsung Galaxy Nexus
    6:02
  • Sony Xperia T
    6:01
  • Motorola Atrix HD
    6:01
  • HTC Vivid
    6:00
  • HTC Radar
    5:54
  • Nokia Lumia 800
    5:52
  • Nokia Lumia 520
    5:50
  • HTC Titan II
    5:50
  • BlackBerry Bold 9790
    5:47
  • HTC One X
    5:45
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro
    5:44
  • Sony Xperia Z
    5:39
  • Sony Xperia acro S
    5:38
  • HTC Desire X
    5:38
  • Pantech Burst
    5:38
  • Sony Xperia ZL
    5:28
  • Meizu MX
    5:27
  • HTC Rhyme
    5:23
  • HTC One V
    5:20
  • Acer CloudMobile S500
    5:18
  • Oppo Find 5
    5:18
  • Nokia Lumia 900 for AT&T
    5:18
  • BlackBerry Curve 9380
    5:09
  • HTC Rezound
    5:03
  • Samsung Galaxy Fame
    5:02
  • Google Nexus 4
    4:55
  • Sony Xperia L
    4:44
  • Samsung Galaxy S Duos
    4:30
  • Sony Xperia P
    4:30
  • LG Nitro HD
    4:17
  • LG Optimus 4X HD
    4:14
  • LG Optimus 3D Max P720
    3:28
  • Nokia Lumia 710
    3:27

In the end, thanks to its efficient talk times and optimized web browsing, the Xperia ZR managed to pull off an endurance rating of 62 hours. We did experience strange battery drains on a couple of occasions when we left the phone idle overnight, so it wasn’t always so great when it comes to stand-by, though.


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

Google to provide free Wi-Fi hotspot to 7000 Starbucks coffee shops in the US

Google has teamed up with Starbucks to provide a free Wi-Fi hotspot in all of the chain’s 7000 coffee shops around the USA. The search giant promises that once the update has finished, customers will be able to enjoy the web at speeds “up to 10x faster than before”.

And if a particular Starbucks coffee shop happens to be in the few areas where Google has its Fiber service set up, the speed bump will be up to 100 times.

As TechCrunch points out, this isn’t Google’s first attempt at providing free Wi-Fi access in a public place. In San Francisco, the company is having talks about setting up free access points in key public spaces. Google’s free hotspots should go live there in April, 2014. There are also numerous Wi-Fi access points in the surroundings of Google’s Mountain View HQ, too.

The joint project with Starbucks kicks off some time in August and won’t happen overnight, but will have gradual rollout, which will take up to 18 months to complete. To see if the Google-powered Wi-Fi network is up and running at your favorite Starbucks coffee shop, check for the one with SSID “Google Starbucks”.


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

We benchmark Sony Xperia Z Ultra’s Snapdragon 800, charts inside

The Sony Xperia Z Ultra is not only an enormous 6.4″ beast of a phablet but it also belongs to a very exclusive group of devices that have the Snapdragon 800 chipset up and running. We got our hands on the device once again and this time we even managed to run a few synthetic benchmarks and see how much of a performance update you are actually getting.

The device should be very zippy courtesy of four Krait 400 cores clocked way up at 2.2 GHz and 2 gigs of RAM. The graphics are dealt with by the latest Adreno 330 GPU, which we’ve heard does a pretty good job.

So let’s look at the numbers. With the hardware specifics out of the way the only thing left to do is analyze the scores. First comes BenchmarkPi, which gives a premium on per-core calculations performance. Here the Sony Xperia Z Ultra was a point shy of tying the first spot – an impressive result indeed, but not quite the one we expected.


Benchmark Pi

Lower is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 GPE
    118
  • Sony Xperia Z Ultra
    119
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
    132
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
    132
  • HTC One GPE
    145
  • HTC One
    151
  • Sony Xperia Z
    264
  • HTC Butterfly
    266
  • Oppo Find 5
    267
  • HTC One X+
    280
  • LG Optimus G
    285
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II
    305
  • HTC One X (Tegra 3)
    330
  • LG Optimus 4X HD
    350
  • Samsung Galaxy S III
    359
  • Meizu MX 4-core
    362
  • Nexus 4
    431

Geekbench 2 is a CPU and memory benchmark and is a pretty good place to compare devices running on different platforms. Here, the Xperia Z Ultra scored an impressive victory over its Android rivals, while the Apple iPhone 5 simply got blown out of the water.

Geekbench 2

Higher is better

  • Sony Xperia Z Ultra
    3889
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
    3324
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
    3227
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 GPE
    3211
  • HTC One GPE
    2458
  • HTC One
    2708
  • Sony Xperia Z
    2173
  • HTC Butterfly
    2143
  • Samsung Galaxy S III
    1845
  • LG Optimus G
    1723
  • LG Optimus 4X HD
    1661
  • Apple iPhone 5
    1601

And finally AnTuTu, a compound benchmark. The Sony Xperia Z Ultra totally wipes the floor with the opposition once again, beating the previous best score by nearly 30%.

AnTuTu

Higher is better

  • Sony Xperia Z Ultra
    33832
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
    26275
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 GPE
    25755
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
    24716
  • HTC One
    22678
  • Sony Xperia Z
    20794
  • HTC One GPE
    18919
  • HTC Butterfly
    19513
  • Samsung Galaxy S III
    15547
  • Oppo Find 5
    15167

Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

Samsung Galaxy S III edges out iPhone 5 in customer satisfaction survey

The first annual customer satisfaction survey from the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) shows a pair of Samsung devices just beating the three most recent Apple smartphones.

The most recent Galaxy S4 flagship was not included because the study was done prior to its release.

This latest survey is a clear indication that Apple’s iOS interface is in dire need of an overhaul, as customers who were polled said there was not a marked difference between the iPhone 4, 4S, and 5. Polled users cited larger screen and relative lower costs of the Note II and S III as the main advantages of the Samsung devices.

The study was done to compliment a larger ASCI study of the complete array of individual manufacturer product offerings, where Apple continues to hold the lead with an ASCI score of 81 out of 100. This is down by 2 points over the previous year and ASCI claims that if Samsung (at 76 out of 100) gets same type of improvement that the S III did over the S II with its current S4 flagship, then the Koreans could close the gap even further.

Apple is allegedly strongly pushing its development of the new iOS 7 platform, which aims to breathe new life into the aging mobile OS. It is rumored to coincide with the development of a new iPhone 5S model alongside a budget iPhone line, which should ideally give Apple a resurgence in the innovation department that’s become characteristic of the Cupertino-based tech giant.

Oddly, in Samsung’s home country of South Korea, where the same poll was performed by the National Customer Satisfaction Index (NCSI), the iPhone 5 scored higher than the Galaxy S III.


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

OpenSignal report visualises Android’s fragmentation

Developers of the OpenSignal app for Android have used their vast user base to measure the level of fragmentation of Google’s mobile operating system. This year, more than 682,000 devices have been surveyed, almost 11,868 of which were distinct Android devices.

In comparison, in 2012 OpenSignal’s report saw just 3,997 distinct Android devices. Those are huge numbers for sure, and they also make for some interesting revelations. One of them is that a 47.5% of the devices are Samsung-made, which is no surprise considering the company’s recent performances.

Sony-Ericsson devices are following Samsung’s lead with 6.5% market share, followed by Motorola and HTC with 4.2% and 3.9% market shares, respectively.

As far as individual devices are concerned, the report’s charts points out that the Samsung Galaxy S III, Galaxy S II and Galaxy Note II are the top dogs with biggest market share. Following them are the Samsung Galaxy Y and the Samsung Galaxy S4 (I9505).

Eight Android software versions have been detected by the survey including the already ancient 1.6 Donut. The latest release of Android 4.3 Jelly Bean hasn’t been included in the report, as it was announced just last week.

Naturally, the comparison between iOS and Android is inevitable. If we discard iOS 7 marking it as an yet unfinished product, then currently the company has the iOS 6, iOS 5 and a negligible percent of earlier versions in the hands of customers. From the pie chart comparison below, you can clearly see Android’s case – with devices running 1.6 Donut and 3.2 Honeycomb slowly but surely heading to extinction, there are 6 major Android versions that are currently available.

The report also contains information from 3,41 million OpenSignal users regarding their phone’s physical screen size. There, things really go out of control, which is why Android developers are very conscious of their user interfaces, as they have to work on a plethora of different screen sizes. You can check out the remaining charts by following the source link below.


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

A Nokia tablet pops up in GFXBench scores running Windows RT on a Snapdragon 800 chipset

We’ve been down this road before so take this with a pinch of salt. A Windows RT tablet by Nokia showed up in GFXBench scores. The device carried the model name RX-114, RX-108 was a model name associated with Nokia tablet early this year (maybe this Tegra 3-powered tablet).

The benchmark reported a resolution of 1371 x 771 pixels for the screen, presumably a minor error with the real resolution being 1368 x 768, the standard 10.1″ Windows RT tablet resolution.

The GPU was listed as Adreno 330, which so far is used only in Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipsets. Sure enough, GFXBench found 4 CPU cores, but unfortunately it has nothing on the clock speed.

By the way, the rumor mill is also waiting on a 6″ phablet from Nokia.

Thanks to everyone who sent this in!


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

Jul 30, 2013

Amazon adds ability to search and purchase books from iOS Kindle app, sort of

If you have used the Amazon Kindle app on iOS, you’d have noticed that there is no way to actually search and purchase books from within the app itself and you would have to do that from Amazon’s website whereas the same is completely possible from Apple’s own iBookstore.

Apple charges 30 percent of in-app purchases for all the apps on the App Store, an amount Amazon would have to pay if they enabled purchasing Kindle books through their app. This is something they wanted to avoid, which is why there was no option to purchase books in the iOS app. That is until now, in a way.

What Amazon has done in the latest update of iOS Kindle app is not provided an outright way of purchasing ebooks (the app wouldn’t be on the store otherwise) but rather a clever trick, which should let you purchase books without leaving your phone. What you can do now is search for free samples of books you want to purchase, which are available for pretty much every book on Amazon. Once you download these, you will find a link to purchase them, which is then emailed to you and you can then purchase it from your phone itself (but not through the app).

While it is a bit of a rigmarole, it does work for now. While it’s unlikely that Apple would whip out a new rule that would forbid this method, you never know.


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

Microsoft updates SkyDrive website with new photo viewing and sharing features

Microsoft has updated the web version of the SkyDrive service with several useful new features. First of all, the site now has support for high DPI displays, such as the Retina display, which means it will now show high DPI versions of images you have uploaded whenever it detects one of these devices.

The site now also has full support for GIF files. Although you could upload GIFs to the service previously they weren’t animated when you viewed them, which has now been fixed.

SkyDrive now also lets you rotate images that you have uploaded, which comes in handy if the orientation was recorded incorrectly by your camera while shooting.

The sharing options have also been updated. Previously you could share a single file at a time or an entire folder. Now, you can mark multiple files and share them as a bunch.

There is also a new Shared view, where you can see all the content you have shared with others. You can see content that you have shared with others on top and what others have shared with you. You can now un-share something and change who has access to which content. Also, now when you share documents with others over email, you can check an option to let them edit the file without having to sign into SkyDrive.

Lastly, SkyDrive now has the ability to view and share multiple types of text files, such as JavaScript, CSS, HTML, which should be handy to developers.


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

Octa-core Samsung Galaxy S4 caught cheating on GPU benchmarks

Samsung I9500 Galaxy S4, the Exynos 5 Octa versions of the flagship, didn’t make it to most of the markets and remained the more exotic option. Production hiccups and delays plus the lack of LTE radio in the initial batch was the reason Samsung switched to Snapdragon 600 chipset and make the I9505 its worldwide flagship.

Anyway, the octa-core version followed shortly after the Snapdragon 600 was launched. We already had a meeting with the beast and found it slightly faster in benchmarks than its international sibling, but weaker when it comes to battery life. A new development however, suggests that the scores posted by the Exynos GPU are obtained by cheating and the I9500 real life performance is lower than its scores indicate.

It’s a really simple yet powerful trick – the GPU clock get boosted when you run specific benchmarks on your octa-core I9500 Galaxy S4 and this way you get about 10% higher result than you should.

Samsung indeed didn’t specify the PoweVR SGX 544MP3 clock, but as per Anandtech’s investigation it runs always at up to 480MHz unless you are using benchmarks. When you do open a benchmark app the Galaxy S4 GPU start ticking at 532MHz and continues to do so until you exit the app.This means the Exynos-powered Galaxy S4 only brings its A-game to benchmarks and does slightly worse elsewhere. It’s not like the smartphone is a slouch with regular apps, but that’s blatant cheating.

We are not quite sure what is the reason for the lower clock cap in non-benchmark apps, but risks of overheating or huge battery drainage are the main suspect.

The CPU of the Galaxy S4 variants was also found to behave somewhat odd with its clock speed forced to the maximum possible the minute you run a benchmark. That’s not technically cheating though, as the power is available if needed elsewhere – there’s no overclocking.

The cheat doesn’t apply on all benchmarks, but Anandtechso far discovered the different behavior on AnTuTu, Quadrant, GL Benchmark 2.5, BenchmarkPi and Linpack.

So, it seems Samsung is trying to polish the octa-core Galaxy S4 reputation. Whatever the reason. we are hoping it doesn’t become a habbit – the company’s flagships have enough power and they don’t need to use such unfair practices to gain an advantage.


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

App of the Week: Runkeeper

By Mary Godfrey

Jul 28, 2013 6:05am
HT runkeeper ap ml 130726 16x9 608 App of the Week: Runkeeper

(Runkeeper)

App Name: Runkeeper

Available Platforms:
iOS and Android

Price: Free

What does this app do?: Runkeeper uses your phone’s GPS to track your workouts and provide you with relevant data, such as your average pace and time, in order to help you gauge your progress and achieve your fitness goals. And now the app’s newest update, released last week, offers more options for would-be and die-hard exercise fanatics alike, including improved in-app training plans to help users set, follow and achieve their fitness goals.

“I want to build the best way for people to get and stay fit,” said Runkeeper’s founder and CEO, Jason Jacobs, who first conceived of Runkeeper in 2007 while training for the Chicago marathon.

At the time, Jacobs used Nike Plus with his pedometer to help him with his marathon training.

“I thought, ‘This is way too big an idea to be locked into to one device – a pedometer, one pair of shoes and one sport,’” said Jacobs.

And from there, he was off and running with a mission to build a fun, approachable, and social fitness app.

Today, Runkeeper aims to give users a comprehensive fitness tool. From the “activity” tab, select a sport, such as running or cycling, create a route or pick from one you’ve uploaded, and choose a target pace. Start recording your activity and Runkeeper will log your distance, pace and length of your workout. Tap the “Me” tab to see how your workouts compare to previous ones and to glean a thorough view of all of your activities and progress – how much faster you ran this week versus last week, or how many total workouts you’ve finished so far, for example.  A cheerful voice, which you can set to chime in at specified intervals, will update you on your status throughout the workout to keep you motivated.

But keeping track and updating all of that information are only some of the functions Runkeeper performs when it comes to its overall purpose:  Jacob’s team recently partnered with coaches and personal trainers to offer in-depth training plans for users who are looking for more knowledge and guidance on how to accomplish their goals.  Although previous versions of the app provided a few training plans, Jacobs said he saw the opportunity to build communities focused on health and fitness within the Runkeeper ecosystem.

“We enabled users to sign up for training plans that not only allow you to follow a calendar, but get other content like suggestions for rest-day activities and healthy tips so you can make better choices,” said Jacobs.

Once you select a goal, such as running a marathon, tap the “training” tab and a tiny calendar broken out by each day of the month appears at the top of your device. Select a specific date to see how many miles or what workout you should complete that day. Rest-day tips may include things like motivational quotes, nutritional advice or pointers on running form.  In total, Runkeeper added 36 training plans to its platform in the most recent update, 12 are free and 24 are paid.

Jacobs and his team recognized the importance of sharing to social platforms early on and  integrated the app with Facebook almost from the start.

“We want people to be able to encourage and motivate each other,” said Jacobs.

Using an open API, he made it so users can customize the app to automatically post results to Facebook and Twitter, as well as create leader boards so friends can see how others are performing.

Still, Jacobs acknowledged users may not want to pollute the social airwaves with frequent updates on their activities. To that end, Runkeeper created its own feed to which you can invite friends and contacts, a curated way of maintaining the element of camaraderie without posting your every move to Facebook.  Users can still choose to post results and comment on others’ achievements, but all of that activity remains within a user’s personal Runkeeper feed.

The most recent release also includes more integration with third-party apps and hardware devices, such as MyFitnessPal and FitBit. When asked “What’s next?” for Runkeeper, Jacobs said he would like to see the app get smarter.

“I’d like to harness the aggregate data of its users and offer them more personalized plans, which, in turn, would get them better results,” said Jacobs.

Is it easy to install?: Simple. Create an account through Facebook or email and enable location services so Runkeeper can track of all those miles you log, rides you bike, or number of times you go to the gym.

Should I try it?: Today, Runkeeper reaches 20 million users, in part because it was one of the first apps to appear in the iTunes Store in 2008. Since its launch, however, other fitness and workout tracking apps have emerged with many of the same features – customizable routes and workouts, and the ability to analyze your progress over time and access to social platforms so you can share your stats.  MapyMyRun and Endomondo perform almost seamlessly when it comes to recording and tracking workouts and offer ways for you to plan and monitor your overall fitness. Apps like Strava and Nike Plus earn accolades from users who love their sleek design and easy-to-use interfaces.  Still, Runkeeper’s utilitarian simplicity makes working with the app well worth the free download if you don’t already use something else.  And Jacobs and his team’s effort to integrate with a variety of hardware devices, as well as their commitment to giving users a richer, more valuable experience by putting training plans at a user’s fingertips, make this app a well-rounded, robust option for would-be fitness junkies.


Source : abcnews[dot]go[dot]com

Jul 27, 2013

‘Riptide GP2′ for iOS and Android game review

Riptide GP2 is the successor to last year’s Riptide GP. For those who don’t know, Riptide GP was a racing game but unlike most other games in this genre, this one let you race around a track filled with water on personal watercrafts, doing all sorts of crazy stunts.

The new one takes it several steps ahead with new tracks, new crafts, new stunts, updated visuals and much more. Let’s see how much of an improvement it is over its predecessor.

Title
Riptide GP2
Developer
Vector Unit
Platform
iOS
Android
Release Date

July 23, 2013
July 25, 2013
Content rating

4+
Everyone
Size
48.2MB
46MB
Price
$2.99

Gameplay

The gameplay in Riptide GP2 remains identical to the first game. You ride a watercraft around a water filled track and race other riders to the finish line. While going around the track you come across ramps which let you jump in air and perform stunts, which in turn earn you boost.

One of the key areas where Riptide GP2 improves upon its predecessor is by providing a lot more stunts to the player. The original game had a handful of stunts that could be performed by swiping on both sides of the screen in a particular pattern. The new one has all the previous stunts but also adds several more that can be unlocked using points that you earn as you play the game. These new stunts are a welcome addition but some of them can be pretty tricky to pull off and remembering them all can get difficult. Eventually, you just end up calling upon the handful that you do end up remembering.

Another addition is the ability to upgrade your watercraft. You earn money by winning races, which can then be spent in upgrading your watercraft. You also purchase faster crafts but that’s a lot more expensive option.

Riptide GP2 also brings several new tracks. Unlike the original game where after a while it felt you are just going around the same tracks in different directions, the new game has a lot more tracks and doesn’t begin to feel old as quickly.

The controls are similar to the previous game but the ability to brake as been added, although you probably won’t be using it a lot. The craft accelerates automatically. You turn by tilting the device sideways or by enabling controls on the side of the screen. To perform stunts, you swipe on both sides of the screen in the respective pattern. A boost button is placed on the screen, slightly out of reach for quick access, that brings a quick and temporary boost of speed. You have a boost bar on the screen that shows how much boost you have left. Once enabled you can’t stop it until the entire reserved drains. You earn boost by performing stunts. If the stunts are are original you get 2x the boost. For repeated stunts you only get 1x boost.

On Android you also get support for controllers, with iOS version set to get controller support shortly, possibly with iOS 7.

The online aspect of the game has been improved a lot in the sequel. You have online multiplayer that pits you against three other players, whether they are your friends or complete strangers. In case of the latter, the game matches you against players with similar stats and craft as you so there is no unfair advantage to anyone. Playing against real people is admittedly a lot more fun but it was also a bit too easy to win somehow. You guys out there playing this game in multiplayer seriously need to try harder.

Online features are present in both iOS and Android version. On iOS the game uses the tried and tested Game Center and on Android it takes advantage of the new Play Games features, such as multiplayer gaming, achievements and online leaderboard. It also supports cloud syncing on both platforms. It’s good to see Android finally catch up in the online gaming aspect. Hopefully, more games will add support for these features soon the way iOS games do.

Graphics and Sound

Riptide GP2 brings subtle but noticeable improvements over its predecessor. You can immediately tell that the water looks better in the new game, among other things. Tegra 4 and new iOS devices get all the best stuff, such as high resolution textures, complex shaders, dynamic lighting and real-time shadows. Non Tegra 4 Android devices and non-Retina iOS devices get reduced visuals but the game still looks pretty impressive nonetheless.

On both platforms you can tune visuals to enable or disable certain features to get the right balance of visual quality and performance. For example, at default settings on the iPad mini the game is fairly smooth but enable things such as lens splash FX and higher quality shaders and the game starts stuttering. Also, certain options are not even available on the iPad mini. If you have an iPhone 5 or the fourth generation iPad with Retina display, you’d be able to get the best visuals without any performance penalty. As for Android, the only Tegra 4 device that you can purchase right now is the NVIDIA SHIELD and even that is not out as of now.

In terms of sound, Riptide GP2 does about alright. There are some dubstep tracks that play in the background as you play and depending upon your preference for dubstep you’d either love them or hate them. The crafts all sound about the same, which is essentially the same as a glorified hair dryer. Then again these things don’t sound much different in real life. Riptide GP2 also adds cheering of crowd, which I believe wasn’t present in the previous game.

Verdict

The original Riptide GP was quite fun but did have a habit of getting old pretty quickly. The new one improves upon that considerably by giving you a lot more stuff to do. There are more tracks, more watercrafts, more stunts, craft upgradability, online multiplayer and updated visuals. All of this makes Riptide GP2 a solid sequel and definitely worth the $2.99 price tag.

Rating: 8/10
Pros: Exciting gameplay, lots of new stunts, superb visuals
Cons: Non-Tegra 4 Android devices don’t get the extra visual effects regardless of hardware capability, multiplayer limited to four players


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

HTC One mini comes back for seconds, we shoot another hands-on video with it

Our first encounter with the HTC One mini was shorter than we would have liked so we invited it back for round 2. It made a good first impression, let’s see how it will fare once the feeling of novelty has subsided.

Holding it for a second time, we still think the One mini offers a more premium feel than many high-end phones do.

We’re not thrilled about the plastic strip that runs the side of the device, but other than that the HTC One mini is a spitting image of its bigger namesake. The aluminum unibody, the gorgeous screen, the symmetrical BoomSound speakers, the UltraPixel camera, this phone ticks all the right checkboxes.

The downscaling process did result in the loss of several features – the quad-core processor with 2GB of RAM and the Optical Image Stabilization are perhaps the worst, with the 16GB-only storage coming a very close second. We wish HTC would introduce a 32GB model. Also missing are NFC, the IR blaster, and the MHL functionality on the microUSB port and the battery has taken a 500mAh cut to 1,800mAh.

Still, you get the exact same software package on the HTC One mini you do on the big flagship, meaning Android 4.2.2 with Sense 5, BlinkFeed, Zoe features for the camera and gallery and even a fully-featured Office document editor.

Here’s a quick demo of these features following a tour around the hardware:


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

iFixit takes apart Nexus 7 2 and gives it a good score, Chromecast also disassembled

It would be a big shame if something on your brand new Nexus 7 2 broke, but as it turns out if it did, it wouldn’t be too hard to repair. iFixit took the new 7” Google tablet apart and awarded it a repairability score of 7/10.

The team also took apart a Chromecast, but mostly out of curiosity – the $35 stick is made out of a plastic enclosure and a motherboard, there’s nothing to repair there.

But back to that in a minute. The new Nexus 7 2 proved a bit difficult to open with the back cover getting cracked. Anyway, inside is a 3.8V 3,950mAh battery (which was rather tough to remove too) under a wireless charging coil and an NFC antenna.

The motherboard has a Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 APQ8064-1AA chipset, which as it turns out is a downclocked Snapdragon 600 chipset – four Krait 300 cores (rather than Krait 200) at 1.5Ghz and Adreno 320. There are also four Elpida 512MB RAM chips, SK Hynix 16GB eMMC storage, a Wi-Fi a/b/g/b and BT4.0 capable Qualcomm chip and an Analogix SlimPort transmitter.

Besides the difficulties of opening the Nexus 7 2 and removing the battery, the iFixit team says the Gorilla Glass is glued to the LCD, which means you’ll need a heat gun to replace the glass if it cracks.

As for the Chromecast, there’s very little going on – a motherboard and a solid aluminum strip that acts as a heatsink. The little stick is powered by a Marvell DE3005-A1 chipset (with two 1.2GHz CPU cores comparable to Cortex-A9), 512MB low-voltage DDR3 RAM, 2GB flash memory and Wi-Fi b/g/n and Bluetooth 3.0 capable wireless chip.

Hit the iFixit site for step by step disassembly instructions with photos the whole way through.


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

Jul 26, 2013

BlackBerry Q5 battery life tests complete, here are the results

The BlackBerry Q5 is a business phone, meaning no matter what it has to have charge left over or you could miss all sorts of important calls and messages. The BlackBerry Z10 wasn’t bad with a 46 hours endurance score (but then it only has a 1,800mAh battery), then the Q10 beat it with a 56 hours score (but it does have a bigger 2,100mAh battery and smaller screen).

The Q5 has a 2,180mAh battery, same size screen as the Q10 (but LCD instead of AMOLED) and a lower clocked chipset. How did it do?

The talk time was a respectable 14 and half hours, well ahead of the 8 short hours provided by the Z10 but behind the 20 hours of the Q10. What’s the difference between Q5 and Q10 when the batteries are practically the same and the screen is off? Different modem that’s what – some Q10 models have CDMA connectivity so BlackBerry must have used a different modem.


Talk time

  • Huawei Ascend Mate
    25:12
  • Motorola RAZR MAXX (ICS)
    21:18
  • LG Optimus G Pro
    20:45
  • Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
    20:24
  • Motorola RAZR i
    20:07
  • BlackBerry Q10
    20:00
  • Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3
    19:54
  • Sony Xperia SP
    19:49
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
    18:03
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II N7100
    16:57
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
    16:40
  • Sony Xperia Z
    16:03
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom
    15:32
  • LG Optimus G
    15:30
  • Sony Xperia ZL
    15:22
  • Nokia Lumia 720
    15:17
  • BlackBerry Q5
    14:31
  • Nokia Lumia 620
    14:17
  • Oppo Find 5
    14:17
  • Google Nexus 4
    14:17
  • HTC One
    13:38
  • HTC One X+
    13:31
  • Nokia Lumia 520
    13:33
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
    13:10
  • Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos
    12:45
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 GPE
    12:37
  • Huawei Ascend P1
    12:30
  • Sony Xperia L
    12:30
  • HTC Butterfly
    12:18
  • Samsung Galaxy Note
    12:14
  • Samsung I8530 Galaxy Beam
    11:58
  • Samsung Galaxy Premier
    11:30
  • Asus Padfone 2
    11:20
  • HTC Droid DNA
    11:07
  • HTC Windows Phone 8X
    11:07
  • Samsung Wave 3 S8600
    11:07
  • Samsung I9105 Galaxy S II Plus
    11:06
  • HTC Desire X
    11:03
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
    11:01
  • HTC One X (AT&T, LTE)
    10:35
  • Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III
    10:20
  • Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III (JB)
    10:15
  • Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2
    10:03
  • HTC One V
    10:00
  • Meizu MX 4-core
    10:00
  • Samsung Galaxy Express
    10:00
  • HTC One X
    9:57
  • HTC One S
    9:42
  • Samsung I9103 Galaxy R
    9:40
  • HTC Sensation XL
    9:30
  • Nokia Lumia 810
    9:05
  • Nokia Lumia 710
    9:05
  • Acer CloudMobile S500
    9:05
  • Motorola Atrix HD
    9:04
  • HTC Vivid
    9:02
  • Nokia Lumia 920
    8:56
  • Nokia Lumia 610
    8:51
  • HTC Rhyme
    8:48
  • Apple iPhone 5
    8:42
  • LG Optimus 3D Max P720
    8:42
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
    8:41
  • Meizu MX
    8:39
  • Samsung Galaxy S II
    8:35
  • Samsung Galaxy S Duos
    8:28
  • Nokia Lumia 800
    8:25
  • Samsung Galaxy Nexus
    8:23
  • Nokia Lumia 510
    8:22
  • Samsung Galaxy Fame
    8:21
  • BlackBerry Z10
    8:20
  • HTC Desire V
    8:20
  • Samsung Captivate Glide
    8:20
  • Sony Xperia T
    8:15
  • HTC Rezound (LTE)
    8:10
  • Samsung Galaxy Note (LTE)
    8:02
  • LG Optimus Vu
    7:57
  • LG Optimus 4X HD
    7:41
  • Apple iPhone 4S
    7:41
  • Samsung i937 Focus S
    7:25
  • HTC Evo 4G LTE (LTE)
    7:21
  • Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G
    7:14
  • Nokia Lumia 820
    7:09
  • Sony Xperia acro S
    7:09
  • Samsung Rugby Smart I847
    7:09
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro
    6:57
  • Nokia N9
    6:57
  • HTC Radar
    6:53
  • Samsung Galaxy Ace Duos
    6:53
  • BlackBerry Curve 9380
    6:52
  • Sony Xperia E dual
    6:42
  • Samsung Galaxy S III mini
    6:22
  • Samsung Galaxy Pocket
    5:54
  • Nokia Lumia 900 for AT&T (LTE)
    5:53
  • Sony Xperia ion LTE
    5:52
  • Sony Xperia P
    5:33
  • Nokia 808 PureView
    5:16
  • LG Nitro HD (LTE)
    5:16
  • HTC Titan II (LTE)
    5:10
  • BlackBerry Bold 9790
    5:00
  • Pantech Burst
    4:46

If your business has you checking the Web constantly, the BlackBerry Q5 doesn’t disappoint – it toppled the HTC One by just a few minutes and is now our reigning champ of web browsing with a bit over 10 hours. That’s over an hour better than what the Q10 (and its AMOLED screen) did. Whether a 3.1″ square is enough for web browsing is another matter.

Web browsing

  • BlackBerry Q5
    10:04
  • HTC One
    9:58
  • Apple iPhone 5
    9:56
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
    9:47
  • Motorola RAZR MAXX (ICS)
    9:12
  • Apple iPad mini
    9:05
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom
    8:51
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II N7100
    8:48
  • BlackBerry Q10
    8:42
  • Nokia Lumia 810
    8:20
  • Asus Padfone 2
    8:20
  • Huawei Ascend Mate
    8:17
  • Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3
    8:17
  • Nokia Lumia 610
    8:01
  • HTC One X+
    7:56
  • Sony Xperia E dual
    7:42
  • Samsung Galaxy S III mini
    7:38
  • Nokia Lumia 720
    7:37
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
    7:35
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
    7:24
  • Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
    7:23
  • HTC Radar
    7:17
  • Nokia Lumia 520
    7:15
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 GPE
    7:13
  • Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos
    7:09
  • Samsung Galaxy Express
    7:09
  • Motorola RAZR i
    7:06
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
    6:58
  • Apple iPhone 4S
    6:56
  • HTC One V
    6:49
  • LG Optimus G Pro
    6:40
  • Samsung I9105 Galaxy S II Plus
    6:40
  • Sony Xperia L
    6:40
  • HTC Droid DNA
    6:40
  • Samsung Galaxy Premier
    6:40
  • Motorola Atrix HD
    6:40
  • BlackBerry Curve 9380
    6:40
  • Sony Xperia Z
    6:37
  • Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2
    6:35
  • BlackBerry Z10
    6:27
  • Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III (JB)
    6:27
  • HTC Butterfly
    6:24
  • Sony Xperia SP
    6:18
  • Samsung i937 Focus S
    6:15
  • Nokia Lumia 510
    6:13
  • Sony Xperia ZL
    6:04
  • HTC Windows Phone 8X
    6:01
  • Sony Xperia ion LTE
    5:56
  • Samsung Galaxy Fame
    5:55
  • Samsung Rugby Smart I847
    5:53
  • Pantech Burst
    5:51
  • Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G
    5:45
  • HTC Desire V
    5:44
  • HTC Evo 4G LTE
    5:41
  • Nokia Lumia 920
    5:40
  • Samsung Wave 3 S8600
    5:34
  • Oppo Find 5
    5:33
  • Sony Xperia T
    5:33
  • Samsung Captivate Glide
    5:33
  • Samsung I8530 Galaxy Beam
    5:28
  • Samsung Galaxy Note LTE
    5:24
  • Samsung Galaxy S Duos
    5:23
  • HTC Sensation XL
    5:20
  • Meizu MX 4-core
    5:19
  • Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III
    5:17
  • Sony Xperia acro S
    5:16
  • HTC Rezound
    5:16
  • HTC Desire X
    5:16
  • LG Optimus G
    5:15
  • HTC Rhyme
    5:08
  • Samsung I9103 Galaxy R
    5:07
  • HTC One X (AT&T)
    5:03
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro
    4:50
  • LG Optimus Vu
    4:49
  • HTC Vivid
    4:46
  • Samsung Galaxy Ace Duos
    4:45
  • Meizu MX
    4:35
  • Google Nexus 4
    4:34
  • Nokia N9
    4:33
  • Acer CloudMobile S500
    4:32
  • Nokia Lumia 820
    4:24
  • Samsung Galaxy S II
    4:24
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
    4:20
  • HTC One X
    4:18
  • Nokia 808 PureView
    4:14
  • LG Optimus 3D Max P720
    4:10
  • Nokia Lumia 900 for AT&T
    4:10
  • Nokia Lumia 800
    4:07
  • HTC Titan II (LTE)
    4:05
  • HTC One S
    4:03
  • BlackBerry Bold 9790
    4:02
  • LG Nitro HD
    4:00
  • LG Optimus 4X HD
    3:59
  • Sony Xperia P
    3:59
  • Nokia Lumia 710
    3:51
  • Nokia Lumia 620
    3:50
  • Samsung Galaxy Pocket
    3:47
  • Samsung Galaxy Note
    3:35
  • Huawei Ascend P1
    3:23
  • Samsung Galaxy Nexus
    3:01

Finally, video playback – even execs have to unwind. The BlackBerry Q5 added over an hour to the Q10′s time and is one of the best phones in this category. Again, watching even 4:3 videos will leave black bars, let alone what happens to 16:9 video.

Video playback

  • Motorola RAZR MAXX (ICS)
    16:35
  • Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
    14:17
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
    13:12
  • Apple iPad mini
    12:51
  • Samsung Galaxy Premier
    12:51
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 GPE
    12:32
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
    12:30
  • BlackBerry Q5
    12:28
  • Huawei Ascend Mate
    12:18
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
    11:29
  • Samsung Galaxy Note II N7100
    11:27
  • BlackBerry Q10
    11:15
  • Apple iPhone 5
    10:12
  • HTC One
    10:02
  • Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III
    10:01
  • Samsung Galaxy Express
    10:00
  • Samsung I9105 Galaxy S II Plus
    10:00
  • Nokia 808 PureView
    9:53
  • Samsung I8530 Galaxy Beam
    9:42
  • Samsung Rugby Smart I847
    9:34
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom
    9:30
  • HTC One S
    9:28
  • Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III (JB)
    9:27
  • Apple iPhone 4S
    9:24
  • HTC Evo 4G LTE
    9:07
  • BlackBerry Z10
    8:44
  • LG Optimus G Pro
    8:40
  • Nokia N9
    8:40
  • Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3
    8:34
  • HTC Butterfly
    8:28
  • Samsung Galaxy Note
    8:25
  • Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos
    8:11
  • HTC One X+
    8:11
  • Motorola RAZR i
    8:11
  • Samsung Galaxy S II
    8:00
  • Samsung i937 Focus S
    7:55
  • Samsung Wave 3 S8600
    7:52
  • Samsung Galaxy S III mini
    7:46
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
    7:45
  • Asus Padfone 2
    7:38
  • Huawei Ascend P1
    7:38
  • Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G
    7:33
  • HTC Droid DNA
    7:30
  • Samsung Galaxy Note LTE
    7:30
  • Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2
    7:30
  • Sony Xperia SP
    7:27
  • Nokia Lumia 610
    7:23
  • LG Optimus G
    7:16
  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
    7:03
  • Nokia Lumia 720
    6:43
  • Meizu MX 4-core
    6:33
  • Nokia Lumia 620
    6:32
  • HTC Windows Phone 8X
    6:27
  • Sony Xperia E dual
    6:27
  • Nokia Lumia 810
    6:27
  • HTC Desire V
    6:26
  • HTC One X (AT&T)
    6:26
  • Nokia Lumia 820
    6:25
  • Samsung Galaxy Ace Duos
    6:25
  • Nokia Lumia 510
    6:23
  • LG Optimus Vu
    6:23
  • Samsung I9103 Galaxy R
    6:21
  • Nokia Lumia 920
    6:19
  • HTC Sensation XL
    6:12
  • Samsung Galaxy Pocket
    6:06
  • Samsung Captivate Glide
    6:04
  • Sony Xperia ion LTE
    6:03
  • Samsung Galaxy Nexus
    6:02
  • Sony Xperia T
    6:01
  • Motorola Atrix HD
    6:01
  • HTC Vivid
    6:00
  • HTC Radar
    5:54
  • Nokia Lumia 800
    5:52
  • Nokia Lumia 520
    5:50
  • HTC Titan II
    5:50
  • BlackBerry Bold 9790
    5:47
  • HTC One X
    5:45
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro
    5:44
  • Sony Xperia Z
    5:39
  • Sony Xperia acro S
    5:38
  • HTC Desire X
    5:38
  • Pantech Burst
    5:38
  • Sony Xperia ZL
    5:28
  • Meizu MX
    5:27
  • HTC Rhyme
    5:23
  • HTC One V
    5:20
  • Acer CloudMobile S500
    5:18
  • Oppo Find 5
    5:18
  • Nokia Lumia 900 for AT&T
    5:18
  • BlackBerry Curve 9380
    5:09
  • HTC Rezound
    5:03
  • Samsung Galaxy Fame
    5:02
  • Google Nexus 4
    4:55
  • Sony Xperia L
    4:44
  • Samsung Galaxy S Duos
    4:30
  • Sony Xperia P
    4:30
  • LG Nitro HD
    4:17
  • LG Optimus 4X HD
    4:14
  • LG Optimus 3D Max P720
    3:28
  • Nokia Lumia 710
    3:27

In the end, the lower talk time and not quite as efficient standby lead to an endurance rating of 55 hours for the BlackBerry Q5, an hour short of what the Q10 managed. You can read more about how we do battery tests here.


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

New and old Nexus 7 tablets go into benchmark skirmish

When Google announced the new Nexus 7 2, the team promised an almost double (1.8x) increase in performance for the CPU and a quadruple jump for the GPU over the original. Note that the number of pixels on the screen more than doubled with the move to WUXGA resolution.

So, what do the benchmarks show?

Both Nexus 7″ tablets have quad-core processors, but the original has Cortex-A9 cores, while the new one uses Krait cores (which are clocked higher to boot).

In Geekbench 2, the new Nexus 7 2 practically doubles the CPU score. Interestingly, the Kraits scored lower integer and floating point marks, but faster memory allowed the Snapdragon to climb on top in the memory and stream performance scores that Geekbench 2 measures.


Geekbench 2

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S4
    3227
  • LG Optimus G Pro
    3040
  • HTC One
    2708
  • Nexus 7 2
    2650
  • Google Nexus 10
    2543
  • Sony Xperia Tablet Z
    2200
  • Sony Xperia Z
    2173
  • HTC Butterfly
    2143
  • Sony Xperia ZL
    1995
  • Samsung Galaxy S III
    1845
  • LG Optimus G
    1723
  • iPhone 5
    1601
  • Nexus 7 2
    1344
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1
    1130

The Nexus 7 had issues with the internal storage in terms of speed, but the new Nexus 7 2 seems to have resolved them. Androbench reported much faster sequential read and double random read and write speeds, with SQLite performance going up considerably.

Note that when the Android Police team ran the benchmarks, they used a Nexus 7 running Android 4.2.2. They re-ran the tests with Android 4.3, but there was virtually no change.


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

New Nexus 7 goes on sale ahead of schedule

Google unveiled its second-generation Nexus 7 tablet a couple of days ago and the company had announced that the Nexus 7 2 will be available in US from July 30. However, Best Buy one of the official retailers of the slate has jumped the gun and has started shipping out the tablet to those who pre-ordered it.

The Nexus 7 is also available in the Best Buy stores if you are planning to pick it up in person. Google has also revealed the pricing of the device and, as expected, the 16 GB model would cost you $230, while the 32 GB comes with a price tag of $270.

In case you are looking at the specifications, the Nexus 7 comes with a 1920 x 1200 resolution display and features a Snapdragon S4 Pro chipset with 1.5 GHz quad-core Krait processor and 2 GB of RAM. There is a 5 megapixel rear camera on board as well as 1.2 megapixel front camera, Android 4.3 Jelly Bean and 3,950mAh battery.


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

AMD Richland processor sets 8.2GHz record

The Finnish extreme over-clockers “The Stilt” have set a new world record for clock speed. Using the AMD A10-6800K Richland APU, the guys managed to reach 8.2 GHz clock speed.

The AMD flagship chip was mounted on an ASUS F2A85-V Pro board and with the help of liquid nitrogen, the enthusiasts managed to reach a voltage of 2,008 volts and resulted in a core clock speed of 8,000.48MHz with its bus clock reading 126.99MHz.

The Stilt also found out that in an experiment that an x87-fix would increase the performance quite significantly in SuperPi. Meanwhile, the Finnish over-clockers managed to break their own record when they succeeded to hit a clock speed of 8,203.01MHz with a liquid nitrogen cooling system and voltage of 1,968V

The 8.2 GHz clock speed was possible with a multiplier of 63 and 130.21 bus clock. Check out the source link below for the world rankings of the over-clockers league.


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com

Sony Xperia Z and ZL get the official Android 4.3 AOSP treatment

Sony was quick to announce the list of devices that will get Android 4.3 and release an AOSP ROM for the Xperia Tablet Z. The Japanese have since updated the post with good news for Xperia Z and Xperia ZL owners – they get an AOSP build too.

Note that this is the early days and just like the Xperia Tablet Z build things aren’t 100% operational and the builds aren’t suitable for daily use.

Still, it’s nice to see a maker react so quickly to the release new Android version. This will also help developers of custom ROMs who are no doubt digging into Android 4.3′s source code trying to adapt it to their own builds.

Anyway, there’s no file you can flash on your Sony Xperia Z or ZL phone, instead you’ll have to grab the repo from GitHub and build it yourself. Instructions on how to do that and flash the resulting ROM (and unlock the bootloader if you haven’t already) are available on the respective GitHub pages – for the Xperia Z and Xperia ZL.

If you don’t know what GitHub is, you can also download the Xperia Z ROM built by an XDA-Developers member pulser_g2. We didn’t find a similar build for the ZL, if you do drop a link in the comments.


Source : blog[dot]gsmarena[dot]com